99% oIl Indians are dishonest, but I strongly feel that the 97% Indian people are honeM) SA: So, you are the only honest person in lndia( laugh) The individual submitted and earn Leave for three days to attend scheduled meeting as he was denied Ty. The cheqees were returned by PMO letter No 365/11/C/2/2000IPOL dated and R&D Hqr letter No DOP/P/2/20027/MISC/M/0 I dated 0202/2001 with the assurance of appropriate action.Īn official confirmation for meeting with SA to RM on at 1230 hrs was given to PD Dandriyal at 1300 Hrs on. Dandriyal submitted two cheques of his take home salary to Prime Minister’s National relief fund as Dr Bains stopped giving him any work in retaliation. The representation highlights the sabotage of national interest, misappropriation of Government funds, misinterpretation of Government rules, regionalism, castism by Dr. Amarjeet Singh Bains, Director DEAL, DRDO, Dehradun. P.D.Dandriyal brought on to notice or Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri, Defence Minister, Prime Minister and Honorable President of India, the immoral character of Dr. P D Dandriyal Charge man – II/ Technical Assistant/ Sr. The following were present Dr.V.K.Aatre Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri Secretary (R&D), DRDO, Director General (R&D), Ministry of Defence, Government of Indiaĭr. New Delhi Office of Scientific Adviser to Raksha Mantri Record of Discussions Venue Room : Room No -137 South Block. Some of the activity which were suppose to be taken early was ignored by DRDO as then SA to RM due to his poor fore slightness ignored the real requirements of our Defence Services. Today there is lot of hue & cry about the Chinese presence along with border from NEFA to POK, every Indian hearing through news channels and it is talk of the common people about our preparations vis-a-vis the Chinese capability. “įollowing is the example Vision/Working/commitment/Long Term Planning/Communication with fellow workers – Dr V K Atre then SA to RM commented about DRDO is following. If the DRDO had not come in the way we would have got them before the Kargil war and that would have definitely reduced our casualties,” he told Karan Thapar during a show.Īsked whether DRDO was “slight boastful” in claims over developing weapons, Malik said “well that has been our (armed forces’) experience over the development of weapons and equipment the DRDO has delivered or not delivered. “We had one or two incidents particularly on the weapon locating radar. The KARGIL WAR proved the biggest failure of DRDO and its leadership.Īs former Army chief V P Malik, who led the army during the 1999 Kargil war, has said casualties in the conflict could have been reduced had DRDO “not come in the way” in the acquisition of weapon-locating radars. And the ultimate looser is the poor tax payers. Unfortunately due to over confidence or may be the political interference a leader who do not deserves the post is selected to lead the organisation. The Government of India in its pursue to provide leader ship to an organisation like DRDO/ISRO/BARC etc always selects the chief through a selection process whose search committee examine the whereabouts of the individual whom the responsibility is to be given.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |